
Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$35.15$35.15
FREE delivery:
Wednesday, April 3
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: MOM JANNY SHOP
Buy used: $26.99
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
77% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
& FREE Shipping
89% positive over last 12 months

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Foundations (Volume 1) (We the People) Paperback – March 15, 1993
Purchase options and add-ons
Bruce Ackerman offers a sweeping reinterpretation of our nation’s constitutional experience and its promise for the future. Integrating themes from American history, political science, and philosophy, We the People confronts the past, present, and future of popular sovereignty in America. Only this distinguished scholar could present such an insightful view of the role of the Supreme Court. Rejecting arguments of judicial activists, proceduralists, and neoconservatives, Ackerman proposes a new model of judicial interpretation that would synthesize the constitutional contributions of many generations into a coherent whole. The author ranges from examining the origins of the dualist tradition in the Federalist Papers to reflecting upon recent, historic constitutional decisions. The latest revolutions in civil rights, and the right to privacy, are integrated into the fabric of constitutionalism. Today’s Constitution can best be seen as the product of three great exercises in popular sovereignty, led by the Founding Federalists in the 1780s, the Reconstruction Republicans in the 1860s, and the New Deal Democrats in the 1930s.
Ackerman examines the roles played during each of these periods by the Congress, the Presidency, and the Supreme Court. He shows that Americans have built a distinctive type of constitutional democracy, unlike any prevailing in Europe. It is a dualist democracy, characterized by its continuing effort to distinguish between two kinds of politics: normal politics, in which organized interest groups try to influence democratically elected representatives; and constitutional politics, in which the mass of citizens mobilize to debate matters of fundamental principle. Although American history is dominated by normal politics, our tradition places a higher value on mobilized efforts to gain the consent of the people to new governing principles. In a dualist democracy, the rare triumphs of constitutional politics determine the course of normal politics.
More than a decade in the making, and the first of three volumes, We the People, Volume 1: Foundations speaks to all who seek to renew and redefine our civic commitments in the decades ahead.
- Print length384 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBelknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press
- Publication dateMarch 15, 1993
- Dimensions6.11 x 1.02 x 9.21 inches
- ISBN-100674948416
- ISBN-13978-0674948419
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
“This book is one of the most important contributions to American constitutional thought in the last half-century.”―Cass R. Sunstein, New Republic
“We the People can be recommended to anyone seeking a readable and complete introduction to the state of current Constitutional thought. Its analysis of the constraints on past and present judges and legal theorists, and the weaknesses in a panoply of jurisprudential positions is lucid and elegant.”―Stephen Presser, Chicago Tribune
“The most important project now underway in the entire field of constitutional theory…to be published in this decade…indeed, perhaps in the past half-century… Ackerman posits a complex process of ‘Publian politics’ where ‘We the People’ become authorized to change the Constitution without ever invoking the procedures laid out in Article V… We the People can also lay claim to being the most significant work in ‘constructive’ American political thought since Louis Hartz’s The Liberal Tradition in America, published some 35 years ago… Ackerman is reopening the question about ‘American exceptionalism’ and arguing, with extraordinary vigor, that American political development is indeed importantly different from European and other models.”―Sanford Levinson, University of Texas School of Law
“[We the People is] one of the most distinguished works on the American Constitution since World War II. It combines law, political theory, political science―and even a little economics―with a rare attention to history, and it does so while developing an extremely innovative and original argument, one that has a solid claim to acceptance… There is no doubt that the book will be highly influential. I think that it will significantly alter the way that people think and talk about the American Constitution… The book is extremely well-written. Indeed, it successfully carries out the most unusual task of making difficult matters accessible to an extremely wide audience… This is a truly distinguished contribution to constitutional thought, one that will reorient the field in major ways.”―Cass R. Sunstein, University of Chicago Law School
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press; Revised ed. edition (March 15, 1993)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 384 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0674948416
- ISBN-13 : 978-0674948419
- Item Weight : 1.14 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.11 x 1.02 x 9.21 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,223,317 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #778 in Legal History (Books)
- #1,191 in General Constitutional Law
- #6,816 in Political Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Beyond that, though, the book (or, more accurately, the series) attempts two things. First, it's a descriptive work of how our interpretation of the constitution has changed over time. On that front, most constitutional scholars would agree that Ackerman has a great deal of merit. It's hard to disagree that the Civil War/Reconstruction and the New Deal were two of the three most intense periods of informal constitutional change (i.e., change in the way the constitution is interpreted rather than formal changes to the constitution itself), the other being the Civil Rights Movement. Ackerman's description of the how and why of those changes is entertaining and well-done, not to mention ground-breaking. Second, it's a prescriptive work. In a nutshell, it's Ackerman's theory of how we should interpret the constiution. For obvious reasons, this is the more controversial part of Ackerman's work, not to mention the "hard" part, as one reviewer described it. You don't have to buy Ackerman's theory, though, to find it intriguing. I would note that it's not radical in the political sense (i.e., the Crits). It's rooted enough in history and it provides enough stability that the original meaning scholars have to respect it (in fact, it's really a variant on original meaning, except that it puts meaning circa 1932 and 1966 on equal footing with 1791), yet it offers enough flexibility in interpretation that more liberal scholars have to respect it as well.
Personally, I don't agree with Ackerman's prescriptive guidance, but I thoroughly enjoyed his historical analysis, and the prescriptive part forced me to do some hard thinking--and that's the highest compliment I can pay an author.
This book is a major step forward in recogizing that the fundemental structures of American Constitutional law require both sound analytical models as well as rich historical context.
This is one of the handful of most thought-provoking and persuasive books I have read on the Constitutional process.
However, I also found myself wondering whether Ackerman's story really needs the assumption that constitutional moments are generated by the citizenry organizing for constitutional change (and presumably singing Kumbaya). It seems the same story of synthesizing various time periods of constitutional law could be told even if the development of constitutional law were purely an elite phenomenon. In other words, it doesn't really matter whether "the people spoke" in passing the Reconstruction amendments, or if it was really just a bunch of Republican radicals who made sure that Southern and female "people" played no part in the process.
I personally hope an elite-based approach would work with Ackerman's analysis because he has quite a bit that's worth saving, but I just can't go along with the unrealistic assumption about popular constitutional moments.
Top reviews from other countries

